The headlines read, "The EKD rejects creationism due of theological reasons." Essentially, they contend that any teaching of "intelligent design" is bad science. At the same time, the EKD rejected the "new atheism" which battles against the teaching of the biblical creation accounts. Since the EKD has the right to teach religion in public schools, this debate takes on more meaning.
Presiding Bishop Wolfgang Huber noted that the current debate tends to place one view above the other. However, this "is not in agreement with neiter the knowledge of natural science and theology nor with the 'Evangelical' faith."
So where does the EKD stand? For everything, yet nothing.
1 comment:
This is basically the same position the Archbishop of Canterbury recently took, and my comments on that are here.
Post a Comment